Product Growth Report

Network Effects: Value Multiplies With Every New User

Network effects occur when your product becomes more valuable as more users join. Each new user adds value for all existing users, creating defensibility that features alone can’t match. Slack without teammates is useless; Figma without collaborators loses its power; Miro whiteboards need participants.

Network Effects
  1. 1
    User joins Creates account, starts using product
  2. 2
    User needs collaborators Product value requires others
  3. 3
    User invites others Onboarding prompts team invites
  4. 4
    Invitees join They get value, need more collaborators
  5. 5
    Invitees invite others Growth loop repeats exponentially

What distinguishes network effects from economies of scale (more users = lower costs) is that network effects mean more users = better product for everyone. There are several types, each with different characteristics:

PLG PatternDescriptionExample
DirectMore users = more value for allSlack (more teammates = more useful)
Cross-sideUsers on one side attract othersMarketplaces (buyers attract sellers)
DataMore usage = better productChatGPT (more queries = smarter model)
ProtocolStandardization creates lock-inFigma (design files become company standard)

When network effects work

ConditionWorksFails
CollaborationProduct requires multiple usersProduct works fine alone
Value scalingBetter with more users, not just usableAdding users doesn’t add value
Invite frictionEasy to add collaboratorsHard to get others on board
ArtifactsShared work creates switching costsNothing accumulates
ReachMultiple roles need accessBenefit is personal, not collective

Best Fit Products

CategoryExamples
Team messagingDiscord, Front
Design toolsFigma, Miro
DocumentationCoda, GitBook
Project managementLinear, ClickUp
Video conferencingGoogle Meet, Tuple

Network Effects Examples

Slack: Can’t Use It Alone

Useless without teammates. That’s the point. Slack ($27.7B Salesforce acquisition)1 makes team invites the core action because solo use has zero value. Once teams hit 2,000 messages, they’re likely to convert. This network-driven expansion produces 143% net revenue retention.

How It Works

Slack Network Effects Flow
  1. 1
    User signs up for Slack
  2. 2
    Slack is useless alone, must invite team
  3. 3
    Team joins, starts messaging
  4. 4
    Value increases with every teammate
  5. 5
    Team invites more teams
  6. 6
    Company standardizes on Slack

Lessons

  1. Design for zero solo value so inviting becomes the core action. Slack can’t be used alone, so inviting teammates isn’t optional, it’s how you use the product. If your product works fine alone, there’s no pressure to invite.
  2. Make inviting frictionless because value scales with every user added. More teammates means more useful conversations and channels. Reduce every barrier to adding collaborators.
  3. Store value collectively to compound switching costs. Message history becomes locked organizational knowledge. Shared archives create collective switching costs that grow over time.

Figma: Every Share Forces Signup

Every design review becomes distribution. When designers share Figma files for feedback, reviewers need an account to comment. That mechanic helped Figma grow from 4M to 20M+ users (2019-2024, $749M revenue), prompting Adobe’s attempted $20B acquisition.2

How It Works

Figma Network Effects Flow
  1. 1
    Designer creates design in Figma
  2. 2
    Designer shares link for feedback
  3. 3
    Stakeholder needs Figma account to comment
  4. 4
    Stakeholder becomes user
  5. 5
    Stakeholder shares with others
  6. 6
    Company standardizes on Figma

Lessons

  1. Require accounts for interaction, not just viewing. Figma lets anyone view, but commenting requires signup. This turns every design review into user acquisition without blocking access entirely.
  2. Design for cross-functional reach by being browser-based. No download means lower friction for non-designers (PMs, engineers, executives) who need to review work. Reach beyond your primary persona.
  3. Become the protocol standard through file format dominance. When Figma files become the company standard, workflows create lock-in. File formats and established processes are harder to replace than features.

Miro: Collaboration Creates Stickiness

5M users in 2020. 30M by 2022. Miro’s online whiteboard network runs deep because boards shared for meetings become persistent reference documents that teams return to repeatedly.3

How It Works

Miro Network Effects Flow
  1. 1
    User creates whiteboard for meeting
  2. 2
    User shares board with participants
  3. 3
    Participants need Miro accounts
  4. 4
    Board becomes persistent reference
  5. 5
    Teams return to boards repeatedly
  6. 6
    Boards accumulate organizational knowledge

Lessons

  1. Choose a category where collaboration is inherent, not added. Whiteboards are collaborative by nature. You can’t have a productive whiteboard session alone, making invites essential to the experience.
  2. Create persistent artifacts that outlast the initial interaction. Miro boards don’t disappear after meetings. They become reference documents teams return to, creating ongoing value beyond the network.
  3. Design for cross-team reach to maximize user density per account. Boards get shared across departments, leading to 269 users per client on average. High density means deeper organizational penetration.

Why Network Effects Are Product Design Decisions

Slack with one user is a notes app. Slack with a team is irreplaceable. The network effect isn’t a growth hack bolted on top. It’s an architectural decision that creates a self-sustaining growth loop, making the product useless alone and indispensable together. Network effects are a product design decision, not a marketing strategy.

What People ThinkWhat Actually Works
”Add viral features""Design product to require collaboration"
"More users = network effect""Product must be better with more users"
"Add team features""Make solo use limited or impossible”

Action Items

  1. Use your product alone for a day: Can you get full value without teammates? If yes, you don’t have network effects. You have a solo tool with optional collaboration. That’s fine, but stop claiming network effects.
  2. Count the clicks to invite: From the moment a user thinks “I should add someone,” how many clicks until that person can contribute? Slack: 3 clicks. If yours is 7+, you’re losing invites to friction. Cut it in half.
  3. Measure users per workspace over time: Are workspaces growing from 2 to 5 to 10 users? Or staying at 1-2? Flat density means your product works fine alone. Growing density means the network is pulling people in.
  4. Ask what would break if teammates left: Interview a team that uses your product heavily. “If half your team switched to a competitor, what would you lose?” If the answer is “nothing I couldn’t rebuild,” you don’t have network effects. If it’s “all our shared context,” you do.
  5. Track invite acceptance rate: What percentage of invites convert to active users within 7 days? This measures network pull. Below 20% means either your invite flow is broken or the value prop isn’t clear to invitees. Fix the conversion before sending more invites.

Footnotes

  1. Slack Technologies, S-1 Filing, SEC.gov, April 2019. 143% NRR, $27.7B Salesforce acquisition. Monetizely, “PLG Monetization: Lessons from Slack.”

  2. Figma S-1 Filing (2025). $20B Adobe acquisition blocked, 4M to 20M+ user growth, $749M revenue.

  3. Brainkits Substack, “The 6 Engines of Product-Led Growth.” Miro case study: 5M → 30M users, 269 users per client average.